Cyprus has 45 double taxation agreements and is negotiating with many other countries. Under these agreements, a credit is normally accepted against the tax collected by the country in which the taxpayer is established for taxes collected in the other contracting country, resulting in the taxpayer not paying more than the higher of the two rates. Some contracts provide for an additional tax credit that would otherwise have been due had it not been provided for incentives in the other country, which would have resulted in an exemption or tax reduction. On 7 June 2017, Georgia signed a “multilateral agreement under the OECD Ministry on the implementation of tax treaty measures to prevent base erosion and profit transfer” (LIV). The main objective of the multilateral convention is the implementation of measures related to the BEPS Treaty, in particular minimum standards in contracts relating to the prevention of double taxation under BEPS 6 and 14. The multilateral instrument will cover or amend 34 of Georgia`s 56 agreements to avoid double taxation. The multilateral instrument was ratified by the Georgian parliament on 27 December 2018 and the ratification instrument was tabled at the OECD secretariat. See attached text of the convention: Example of denunciation of double taxation agreements: Suppose interest on ANN [necessary clarifications] bank deposits derive 30 percent of tax deduction at source in India. Since India has signed agreements with several countries to avoid double taxation, the tax can only be deducted at 10-15% instead of 30%. Section 90 and Section 91 of the Income Tax Act of 1961 provide taxpayers with an exemption from double taxation payments. Section 90 applies to cases where India has a bilateral agreement with another nation. These are “foreign agreements or certain areas,” while Section 90A includes “The adoption by the central government of agreements between certain associations to facilitate double taxation.” Section 91 applies to cases where India does not have a bilateral agreement, but a unilateral agreement. It outlines how to benefit from tax relief when “countries with which there is no agreement” can be used.
The OECD model, the UN model, the American model and the Andean model are just a few of these models. Of these, the first three are the most important and most commonly used models. However, a final agreement could be a combination of different models. 5. Provisions to avoid tax evasion: they include Articles 9 (associated companies) and 26 (exchange of information). Individuals (“individuals”) can only reside in one country. People who have foreign subsidiaries may have their headquarters in one country and reside in another country: a subsidiary may receive substantial income in one country, but transfer that income (for example. B in the form of royalties) to a holding company in another country that has a lower corporate tax rate.
This is why controlling inappropriate corporate tax evasion becomes more difficult and requires more investigation when goods, rights and services are transferred.  In this case, the company was founded in Japan.